You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 15 Current »

Location

BrowserRoom SystemPhone Dial-in
https://bluejeans.com/761546516/
  1. Dial: 199.48.152.152 or bjn.vc
  2. Enter Meeting ID: 761546516 -or- use the pairing code

Dial-in numbers:

  • +1 408 740 7256
  • +1 888 240 2560 (US Toll-Free)
  • +1 408 317 9253 (Alternate Number)

Meeting ID: 761546516

(Back to the DMCCB page)

Time

From 9.00 to 09.30 PT, Wednesday, June the 26th.


Attendees

Regrets

DMCCB Meeting Goals

      • See DMCCB responsibilities listed in LDM-294 section 7.4

DMCCB Additional Resources

Discussion Items

ItemDescriptionCCB Notes

Flagged RFCs

(To be approved by the DMCCB)

RFC-604 - Getting issue details... STATUS Planned end: Jun/20/2019

RFC-602 - Getting issue details... STATUS Planned end: Jun/20/2019

RFC-593 - Getting issue details... STATUS Planned end: Jun/15/2019

RFC-606 - Getting issue details... STATUS Planned end: Jun/30/2019

  • RFC-604 and 602 documents on the master branch
    • Kian-Tat Lim  says requirements should be good for now, but they may be improved in the future
      • Leanne Guy and All DM-CCB to check the documents in RFC-604 and RFC-602  
      • Unknown User (gcomoretto) board recommend and issue the document once Leanne's action (on RFC-604 and RFC-602) is done 
  • RFC-593, discussion postponed to next DM-CCB 
  • RFC-606: all CCB agree that this is fine, status changed to Board Recommend
Board Recommended RFCs

RFC-601 - Getting issue details... STATUS Planned end: Jun/07/2019

Adopted but not implemented LDM RFCs (only document RFCs)

None


Proposed RFCs

(to review, do not require DMCCB approval)

RFC-605 - Getting issue details... STATUS Planned end: Jun/26/2019

RFC-600 - Getting issue details... STATUS Planned end: Jun/29/2019

RFC-585 - Getting issue details... STATUS Planned end: Jun/14/2019

  • RFC-605: John Swinbankthinks that the RFC needs to be better understood.
    • Wil O'Mullane flag this RFC and add a comment to address the discussion
  • RFC-600: Leanne Guy says that the RFC has been discussed and the LCR is ready to be pushed to project CCB
  • RFC-585: there is an action on Leanne Guy to discuss this with DESC in 2 weeks. End date to be moved forward

Adopted RFCs without Triggering issues

(to create implementing DM issues)

RFC-599 - Getting issue details... STATUS


Adopted RFCs with all triggered work COMPLETED

(to set status as 'IMPLEMENTED')

None



RFCs adopted since last CCB

(to review, no action required)

RFC-603 - Getting issue details... STATUS


RFCs implemented since last CCB

(to review, no action required)

RFC-213 - Getting issue details... STATUS



Changes to the planned releases
  • 18.0 Release status
    • First Release Candidate based on w_2019_23 now available and under test
  • DM-19147 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  • rc1 seems OK
  • Ready to prepare Characterization report
  • Release note to be done

Monitor Jira issues status:

  • the most forgotten 10 DM issues
    • (resolution = Unresolved ORDER by updated asc)

Support to J. Swinbank monitoring activity

  1. DM-5032 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  2. DM-5081 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  3. DM-5078 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  4. DM-5083 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  5. DM-5134 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  6. DM-3186 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  7. DM-3188 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  8. DM-3189 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  9. DM-1563 - Getting issue details... STATUS
  10. DM-861 - Getting issue details... STATUS

3960 unresolved issues (4055 on June the 12th)

John Swinbank commentary:

  • DM-5032: won't fix.
  • DM-5081: valid; easy enough; not high priority.
  • DM-5078: wonder if we can eliminate PcaPsf; asked on the ticket.
    • Answer is yes; closed as “won't fix” and filed PIPE-31.
  • DM-5083: others (at least Unknown User (gcomoretto) &Kian-Tat Lim, I suspect) know better than I if this is relevant; KTL commented on the issue that this is low priority.
  • DM-5134 is done.
  • Others are all Qserv issues.
    • Unknown User (gcomoretto), would it be worth pinging the relevant T/CAMs before the CCB meets, so that Fritz Mueller  (in this case) has a chance to respond to these issues before we discuss them?

Fritz Mueller commentary:

  • DM-3186, DM-3188, DM-3189, DM-1563, and DM-861 are all to do with potential improvements to the Qserv integration test suites.  These are / may be valid and desirable improvements, but they are lower priority than finishing up features (e.g. ingest, multi-czar, and user-generated products support).  These are all already attached to epic DM-4828 ("Qserv Integration Test Improvements") which will be scheduled as time/priorities permit.
Open Actions

AOB

Next DM-CCB 

July the 3rd no DM-CCB

July the 10th, meeting to be run by Kian-Tat Lim


Pending Flagged RFCs

Key Summary
Loading...
Refresh

Pending Proposed RFCs

Key Summary
Loading...
Refresh

Oldest issues

Key Summary
Loading...
Refresh

Meeting outcome


Pending DMCCB Actions

DescriptionDue dateAssigneeTask appears on
25 Apr 2024Frossie EconomouDMCCB#197 (2024 - 04 - 14)

  • No labels