Just using aperature photometry 12 as the measure since the PsfFlux column in not available in current matched table.
DM-33959 has been bumped up the priority list for pipelines. We're expecting a fix to land in w15. DM-31855 is essentially a duplicate so this has been marked as 'won't fix. This would apply astrometric and and photometric calibrations to source parquet tables.
Would a second matching step need to run to make table of matched sources?
Join once and persist or join every time we run a metric.
There is a value is
We could profile the joining now using the isolatedStarAssociationTask keys as an index
Prior issues with AuxTel photometric calibration issues now understood, a bug to the calibrated fluxes written to parquet tables was discovered and a fix is under development (see
DM-34019
-
Getting issue details...STATUS
). For now, we can still calibrate fluxes using AFW tables and photoCalib object. Calibration is good but shows some systematics in scatter.
I need to generate/register a skymap for the different fields in order perform co-addition, is there a way to do this outside of repo/main to allow for experimentation?
butler register-skymap --config-file /path/to/file /path/to/repo (could experiment on rc2subset, example config in obs_lsst )
Discrete skymaps will become more work than worth at some point.
Option would be to make a small repository and do a test with discrete skymap. Then make skymap in repo/main
Are there any single-visit/detector level metrics are implemented now in Faro that are worth running on the afw tables we have already generated?
Keith and Erik to schedule a meeting to talk about next steps for computing metrics to support AuxTel observing
What quantities are most useful to AuxTel during the night
Merlin is probably the person to talk to about current AuxTel data processing and RubinTV visualization of metric values
Short term
analysis_drp, producing many QA plots. Person is Sophie Reed. Potentially generate a webpage of useful plots. Another source of
Keith Bechtol to make a ticket to better understand mapping of these camera and calibration products characterization efforts to verification documents and the focus of these efforts. Discuss with the SCLT
