; can this be marked complete?
- Need to get rid of ancient stuff
- Production service for development
- Lab resources for testing, for NCSA and others
- Things supporting buildbot are too slow
- No one uses HTCondor cluster
- Authentication and authorization
- Database may need more disk over more CPU
- Send known requests to Don directly
- If local hardware is needed, talk to Jeff
; with update, can this be recommended?
- Still undecided, need to figure out if we can use
superin a way that is compatible with both Python 2 and 3 simultaneously (sixstyle).
; with
, can this be recommended?
- RHL abstains, SAT recommends.
- Dick: what is position of tools that are useful for looking at results?
- Frossie: prefer not to bundle ds9; hard to keep in sync with upstream
- RHL: do use ds9 in a fairly integrated fashion, but not tenable in the long run
- Frossie: should have agnostic interface with drivers/adapters
- RHL: SCAMP is probably not good enough, though
- Either help you install it or just point to Web site
- Xiuqin: also prefer not to bundle, since will be replacing eventually; not hard for users to get it on their own
- Dick: many packages might fall into this category of "useful with stack but not required"
- Want policy for future, but not really a big issue right now; documentation already says to download yourself
- Better error messages might help
- Recommendation: packages for optional features that are tightly integrated and expected to remain so should be distributed; packages even if tightly integrated that are not expected to remain so should not be distributed.
,
,
- Jacek: When to use
u/and when to usetickets/? - KTL: Use
tickets/most times;u/only if ticket branch is shared with multiple people - Simon: Need a training program for existing and new developers
- Jacek: A quick reference page is helpful
- Simon: More than just an E-mail and web page required; lecture video might help
- KTL: Beef up code review process to provide training
- Recommendation: approve all three; training program needs to be developed but is not a prerequisite
Status of GitHub testing
- Looks pretty good so far, no show-stoppers
- Lack of "approve" button in pull request is disappointing
- Simon: How are comments handled when commits are squashed?
- Need to experiment
- Jacek: Look into setting up similar mirror with Stash to experiment there?
- But Stash would always have the disadvantage of not being "public"
- So don't do that for now
- GPDF: Other subsystems are interested, but looking for us to lead
- Recommendation: move to GitHub when practicable, in coordination with other subsystems
- Write a document giving reasons for moving and preferring GitHub to Stash
- Write up a transition plan
Add comments to Jim's reorganization page
Initial introduction
- Take out 30-day precovery issue; only happens during the day (KTL misread LSE-163)
- Add a mention that ForcedDiaSources are gone, but forced DiaSources may need to be flagged