Location

BrowserRoom SystemPhone Dial-in
https://bluejeans.com/761546516/
  1. Dial: 199.48.152.152 or bjn.vc
  2. Enter Meeting ID: 761546516 -or- use the pairing code

Dial-in numbers:

  • +1 408 740 7256
  • +1 888 240 2560 (US Toll-Free)
  • +1 408 317 9253 (Alternate Number)

Meeting ID: 761546516

(Back to the DMCCB page)

Time

From 9.00 to 09.30 PT, Wednesday, May the 1st.


Attendees

Regrets

DMCCB Meeting Goals

Discussion Items

ItemDescriptionCCB Notes

Flagged RFCs

(To be approved by the DMCCB)

Planned end: 15/Mar/19

  • RFC-581 still pending
Board Recommended RFCs

Planned end: 18/Feb/19

Proposed RFCs

(to review, do not require DMCCB approval)

Planned end: 02/May/19

Planned end: 22/Apr/19

Planned end: 13/May/19

Planned end: 02/May/19

  • RFC-595: rationalize data packages outside the obs package
    • discussion on the RFC
  • RFC-594: it is fine for the DMCCB
  • RFC-593: There is some pushback
  • RFC-585
    • End date needs to be moved forward

Adopted RFCs without Triggering issues

(to create implementing DM issues)

None


Adopted RFCs with all triggered work COMPLETED

(to set status as 'IMPLEMENTED')

None



RFCs adopted since last CCB

(to review, no action required)

None


RFCs implemented since last CCB

(to review, no action required)

None



Changes to the planned releases
  • 18.0 Release to be planned (no changes since the last DMCCB)
  • 18.0: end of cycle release
    • start working end of May with due date end of June

Monitor Jira issues status:

  • the most forgotten 10 DM issues
    • (resolution = Unresolved ORDER by updated asc)

Support to J. Swinbank monitoring activity

4053 unresolved issues (4190 on April the 24th)


Pre-meeting John Swinbankcommentary:

  • DM-2358: Won't Fix.
  • DM-2579: Seems like a legit bug which I may have just fixed; should land soon.
  • DM-3198: Invalid (“no longer a useful statement”).
  • DM-2219: Won't Fix.
  • DM-3665: Maybe Won't Fix? See ticket.
  • DM-3664: Low priority, but valid.
    • Comment added to the issue
  • DM-3191: Won't Fix.
  • DM-3589: A bit vague, but probably valid. Asked our current ISR guru to take a look.
  • DM-3413: Probably invalid. Asked Gregory and Frossie (reporter and assignee, respectively) to confirm.
  • DM-3854: Invalid.
AOB
  • Shall we look at document RFCs after adoption to make sure they are finished?
  • Tim Jenness : shall we start listing the adopted but not implemented LDMs?
    • an adopted LDM RFC is almost 99% done.
    • no objections from the DMCCB.


Pending Flagged RFCs

Pending Proposed RFCs
Oldest issues

Meeting outcome


Pending DMCCB Actions