Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Task marked complete

...

  •  Kian-Tat Lim Define standing time slots for design discussions
  •  Gregory Dubois-Felsmann Create memo about whether a change request is needed to reflect the assignment of the alert mini-broker and interface responsibilities. : This overall issue went unresolved for a long time; however, there is now a consensus, as of the October 2016 T/CAM meeting, regarding the division of responsibilities among WBS elements.  It will be reflected in the DM replan documentation.
  •  Jeff Kantor Discuss with Victor KrabbendamSteven Kahn how can DM scientists provide input into discussion (e.g. at TOWG) regarding science operations, software evolution, archive/dp operations.  What is the plan, roadmap for how TOWG and higher level governance team work leads to ops proposal, i.e the schedule, reviews, etc. Robert Lupton and others believe ops steady state is not until 3 - 5 years in, need at least 40% of construction staff level until then.  Tim Jenness thinks that the next TOWG meeting is on Tucson operations.  Unknown User (ciardi) says we should not pre-suppose locations of science operations, we should state what is needed.  
    NOTE: This message was passed on to Victor Krabbendam, he and Steven Kahn are aware and the process will be explained in the months ahead.

...