Versions Compared

Old Version 9

changes.mady.by.user Tim Jenness

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Kian-Tat Lim

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

ItemDescriptionCCB Notes

Flagged RFCs

(To be approved by the DMCCB)

  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-713
    Planned end: Jul/31/2020
  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-711
    Planned end Jul/31/2020
  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-710
    Planned end Jul/28/2020
  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-709
    Planned end Jul/24/2020
  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-708
    Planned end Jul/24/2020
  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-699
    Planned end: Jun/03/2020
  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-695
    Planned end: Aug/31/2020
  • RFC-713: it should just be a procedural thing to approve the test cases already executed
  • RFC-711: no comments, the outcome seems to keep the document, but add an obsolete flag on top of it
    • CCB agreed to board recommend it. Tim Jenness commented.
  • RFC-710/RFC-709: Leanne is preparing the LCR. CCB should approve the RFCs before the LCR is submitted.
    • DMS-REQ-0066 needs to be resurrected. GPFD to review the original text. Leanne Guy to ping GPDF
    • 710 board recommend
    • 709 waiting for GPDF
  • RFC-708:
    • to keep it open for a couple of weeks more, until the final update from P6
  • RFC-699
  • RFC-695
Board Recommended RFCs

Adopted but not implemented LDM RFCs (only document RFCs)

Proposed RFCs

(to review, do not require DMCCB approval)

  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-720
    Planned end: Aug/5/2020
  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-719
    Planned end: Aug/6/2020
  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-718
    Planned end: Aug/7/2020
  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-712
    Planned end: Jul/31/2020
  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-703
    Planned end: Jun/30/2020
  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-697
    Planned end: June/11/2020
  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-638
    Planned end: Jun/7/2021
  • RFC-720: see AOB point.
    • Tim Jenness baseline environment needs to be approved by the DMCCB
    • see discussion RFC-537
      • Kian-Tat Lim this is still valid, even if the stab packages are conda packages now
    • The problem is when a pkg is added to the env, existing pkgs will change their version, in order to keep consistency in the environment.
      • this pull out a set of differences that need to be approved by the DMCCB
      • Kian-Tat Lim suggests that a new RFC for this is not required, since this is the result of an impact analysis
  • Tim Jenness Arch team, before moving the RFC to board recommend, need to provide the changes that a new package is generating in the environment. This will permit the CCB to decide if an RFC introducing a new package can be approved or not
  • DMCCB agreed to board recommend RFC-720
  • John Swinbank asked if we should check if the env change breaks the external user code
    • Tim Jenness no, people usually pick a weekly and stick to it for months
    • Colin Slater  this is acceptable if it happens not so often
    • Tim Jenness due to the use of conda-forge, we can't do puctual updates
    • Kian-Tat Lim the idea is to move the environment in a conda metapackage, and this probably makes possible to pin back some package in the the environemtn
    • Wil O'Mullane CCB needs to be aware that somebody may be affected when other packages changes
  • RFC-719, is not under the radar of the DMCCB
  • RFC-718 
    • this requires a new Jenkins job
  • RFC-712, KT to look at it
  • RFC-703 to move end date to Aug30

Adopted RFCs without Triggering issues

(to create implementing DM issues)

  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-714

Adopted RFCs with all triggered work COMPLETED

(to set status as 'IMPLEMENTED')



RFCs adopted since last CCB

(to review, no action required)

  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-715
  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-714
  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-717
  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-716

RFCs implemented (or withdraw) since last CCB

(to review, no action required)

  • Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyRFC-717


Releases

  • Planned
  • Changes to the release schedule
  • Next planned Release 21.0.0
    • Tentative schedule: November 2020

Monitor Jira issues status:

  • the most forgotten 10 DM issues
    • (resolution = Unresolved ORDER by updated asc)

Support to J. Swinbank monitoring activity.

  1. Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyDM-9418
  2. Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyDM-2351
  3. Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyDM-9442
  4. Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyDM-9444
  5. Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyDM-9445
  6. Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyDM-9399
  7. Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyDM-9436
  8. Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyDM-9454
  9. Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyDM-9469
  10. Jira
    serverJIRA
    serverId9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2
    keyDM-9393

3905 unresolved issues (3887 on July the29th)

Preassess before the CCB starts

  • DM-9418 — reassigned to Architecture team.
  • DM-2351 — needs a comment from Architecture.
  • DM-9469 — needs a comment from the SUIT team.
  • DM-9393 — added comment.


During CCB:

Open Actions

AOB

John Swinbank : Should changes to the scipipe_conda_env require an RFC? My reading of RFC-537 is that they should (although that RFC has only been adopted, not implemented). Does that still hold in the new Conda regime?

discussed above with RFC-720

Next DM-CCB August the 19th (next ween PCW)

...