Item | Description | CCB Notes |
---|
Flagged RFCs (To be approved by the DMCCB) | Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | RFC-575 |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | RFC-579 |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | RFC-581 |
---|
|
| - RFC-575: DMCCB approve it and it is moved to "Board Recommend"
- RFC-579: changes are highlighted in red
- Changed to "Board Recommend"
- RFC-581: to be decided next week
|
Proposed RFCs (to review, do not require DMCCB approval) | Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | RFC-578 |
---|
|
| - No action to be taken from the DMCCB
|
Adopted RFCs without Triggering issues (to create implementing DM issues) | | |
Adopted RFCs with all triggered work COMPLETED (to set status as 'IMPLEMENTED') | Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | RFC-571 |
---|
|
| |
RFCs adopted since last CCB (to review, no action required) | Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | RFC-576 |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | RFC-577 |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | RFC-573 |
---|
|
|
|
RFCs implemented since last CCB (to review, no action required) | Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | RFC-555 |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | RFC-559 |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | RFC-558 |
---|
|
|
|
Changes to the planned releases | - New patch release based on 17.0 major release required:
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | RFC-580 |
---|
|
- Question from John Swinbank : do we maintain 6 month schedule release or do we switch to releases based on functionality availability?
- In practice: when will be science pipelines release 18?
| - 17.0 done
- pipelines.lsst.io need to be updated with 17.0 information
- Community post done today, linking to the 17.0.x branch documentation and updated when JSick will update pipelines.lsst.io
- 17.0.1: approved, RFC set to "Board Recommend".
- Unknown User (gcomoretto) to create the patch release 17.0.1 implementation issue, backport the change and work with Jonathan Sick to include this information in the release note.
- Next release 18:
- in 3 months time (June 2019)
- WOM: would like to see releases based on features
- Leanne: community also would like to see feature base release
- Feature information is provided to T/CAMs from P6 and scientists; these are recorded in Jira as epics
- What is missing is to relate these epics to a planned release
|
Monitor Jira issues status: - the most forgotten 10 DM issues
- (resolution = Unresolved ORDER by updated asc)
| Support to J. Swinbank monitoring activity Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | DM-2393 |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | DM-2790 |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | DM-2826 |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | DM-2824 |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | DM-2820 |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | DM-2589 |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | DM-2587 |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | DM-2563 |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | DM-2810 |
---|
|
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | DM-2819 |
---|
|
3746 unresolved issues (3674 on Feb. the 20th)
| All 10 issues have been reviewed during the CCB. |
AOB | - Should the DMCCB not be considering the RFC _after_ the triggered tickets have been created, rather than before?
| - AOB on RFC moved to next DM-CCB
- LDM-635 draft in docushare need to be sent out for review
- Semantic Versioning 2.0
- Tim Jenness would like to apply it to each GitHub packages, it will simplify the dependencies management
- This requires lot of work and has impacts on the build tools, continuous integration tools, releases, etc
- Everybody agree that SemVer is the direction to move
- An intermediate solution is to apply SemVer to to metapackages, that group together a smaller number of GithHub packages. This requires:
- a proposal written down
- do some experimentation to see how it works
- to do after conda env management has been clarified. See
Jira |
---|
server | JIRA |
---|
columns | key,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution |
---|
serverId | 9da94fb6-5771-303d-a785-1b6c5ab0f2d2 |
---|
key | DM-16567 |
---|
|
|