Date

Attendees

 

Goals
  • Weekly coordination meeting to discuss and resolve management items, project communications, external contacts, etc.

Discussion items

 

ItemWhoNotes
DM Contracts StatusJeff Kantor

DM Contracts status (as of 20150109)SLAC, NCSA, Princeton signed, IPAC (EVM discussion not an issue), UW (AURA responding to last set of comments), UCD (SPO reviewing) close, hope by end of week. REUNA in work with AURA/South, will then address FIU Next priority is hardware procurement amendment for NCSA

IT Security Program (Cyber-security)Donald Petravick
Building enterprise plan covering all of LSST, define security model
Getting off “ad hoc” state to “defined” state
Working with NSF security group
Defined draft information classification scheme (public, internal, sensitive, highly sensitive)
Writing Master Policy, delegating responsibility and getting subplans from subsystems for construction (no operations yet)
DP ghost writing draft DM, Camera, TS plans, iterating with Master Plan updates
Spreadsheet based risks table (with input from K-T)
PM Priorities in January, FebruarayJeff Kantor
- IT security program (ISP, with Don Petravick, Lee LeClair)
- Infrastructure Procurement process with NCSA
- Finish UW, IPAC labor contracts
- Network agreements (REUNA, AMLIGHT, Brazil)
- Prepare for Chilean networks acquisition review (February review)
- NSF risk/contingency negotiations
- SQuaRE scientist hire
- Asst System Architect hire
- DM AHM preparation
- BNL Atlas Review
- EVMS work with Kevin Long
- AURA performance appraisals
- Unpredictable but inevitable requests from Steve Kahn, AMCL, Victor, NSF
W15/S15 PlansJeff Kantor
W15 replan, S15 plan
Need backlog review and also need to revisit LDM-240, update and add dependencies
Need analysis, mid-course correction on how we are using JIRA
AlertsUnknown User (ciardi)
PAC, UW teams met to discuss Alerts last week.
Planning to put team together to do ongoing work

Action items

2 Comments

  1. I don't exactly recall what my action item was here (I've only recently become aware of Confluence tasks), but I'm pretty sure it was basically asking how to move forward with generating a new long-term plan, which is now captured in RFC-17.  I think the resolution of that has essentially been postponed to the next in-person CAM meeting.

    1. Yes, I agree.   RFC-17 - Getting issue details... STATUS  is the place to track this from now on.